Levels of Accreditation
programs w/accreditation status | levels of accreditation | accreditation standards | self study report | fee schedule
LEVELS of ACCREDITATION - an Explanation | |
---|---|
When making an accreditation award decision, PEAC considers the program's compliance with each criterion described in the Accreditation Standards (for example, Standard 1 in the 2012 Accreditation Standards includes six criteria [1.1 - 1.6]). The program's level of accreditation is determined by the percentage of criteria in compliance within each standard. | |
Level of compliance with each criterion is described as follows: | |
Programs whose review took place between Sept 1, 2013 and Sept 1, 2015 (Policy ACC-01A) | |
Compliant
|
Non-Compliant
(has an identified deficiency) |
Programs whose review took place between Sept 1, 2015 and Sept 1, 2017 (Policy ACC-01B) | |
Compliant
|
Non-Compliant
(identified as "Requirement Not Met") |
Programs whose review took place after Sept 1, 2017 (Policy ACC-01C) | |
Compliant
|
Non-Compliant
Not Met |
Accreditation award decisions for an education program will be one of the following, based on number/percentage of criteria which are Non-Compliant (described above): | |
Accredited
|
Non-Accredited
|
CORE criteria are critical. The 2012 Accreditation Standards include four CORE criteria (1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.6). If an established program demonstrates non-compliance (Deficiency/Requirement Not Met/Not Met) in one of the four CORE criteria, it will automatically be awarded probationary accreditation status. | |
Accreditation - Fully Compliant | |
|
|
Accreditation - Partially Compliant | |
|
|
Accreditation - Probationary | |
|
|
Non-Accreditation | |
|
|
STUDENTS - IMPORTANT TO NOTE | |
|